Plan Integrity Review (PIR)

Independent clarity for existing or proposed executive benefit plan decisions.

When organizations request a review

A review is typically requested at key decision points, including:

When an executive benefit plan (e.g., 457(f), SERP, REBA, Split-Dollar) has been in place for years and leadership wants confirmation that it is still functioning as intended
When a plan is about to be approved or implemented, and the organization wants an independent second set of eyes before committing
When leadership, a board, or counsel wants clarity on how the structure works and what assumptions it relies on
When there is concern about long-term sustainability, governance, or external defensibility

Overview of Plan Integrity Review

What it Is

A Plan Integrity Review is a high-level, independent assessment of an existing or proposed executive benefit arrangement.

The Focus

The review focuses on how the structure is designed to operate, what assumptions it relies upon, and whether those assumptions are clearly understood, documented, and governed.

End Goal

The goal is not to validate performance or predict outcomes, but to confirm that the plan is intentional, understood, and defensible before or after implementation.

The purpose

Not change for the sake of change – but confidence that what you have is intentional, understood, and defensible.

What We Review

Each review is tailored to the organization, but typically includes:

Plan intent vs. proposed or current operation
Key structural and economic assumptions relied upon
Vesting timelines and benefit timing awareness
Funding mechanics and sustainability at a high level
Governance, monitoring, and decision documentation
Incentive and compensation awareness at the governance level
Board- and examiner-readiness considerations

The review focuses on clarity and understanding – not on validating product performance or recommending changes.

What You Receive

Plain‑English Plan Snapshot

A clear explanation of how the arrangement is designed to work today.

Risk & Exposure Observations

Identification of potential gaps, assumptions, or areas of uncertainty.

Governance & Oversight Perspective

What a reasonable board member, auditor, or examiner would likely ask, and whether current answers are sufficient.

Optional Paths Forward

If issues are identified, potential options are outlined for consideration. No recommendations or changes are required.

Further Information

What This Review Is Not
By design, a Plan Integrity Review does not include:

Legal interpretation or formal compliance opinions

Rewriting plan documents

Historical fault‑finding

Product recommendations or implementation

This keeps the review objective, focused, and independent.
Who This Is For
The Plan Integrity Review is well‑suited for organizations that:

Have an executive benefit plan in place and want confirmation it is functioning as intended

Are about to approve or implement a SERP, 457(f), Restricted Bonus, or split-dollar arrangement and want an independent second set of eyes before committing

Are approaching a vesting event or leadership transition

Want independent confirmation before a board, auditor, or examiner discussion

Prefer clarity and confidence over complexity
Engagement Structure
One‑time, fixed‑scope advisory engagement

Fee‑based and independent

No obligation to proceed beyond the review

Designed to be shared with management, counsel, or the board
Possible Paths Forward (if relevant)
If the review identifies that a plan or underlying structure no longer aligns with original intent or expectations, the goal is not to force a change, but to clarify what options exist and the tradeoffs associated with each.

Depending on the facts, potential paths forward may include:

Continuing the existing structure with adjusted expectations or governance

Restructuring or repositioning an existing arrangement

Simplifying or de-risking the overall approach

Planning an orderly exit from the current structure

Transitioning to an alternative funding or benefit approach

Any discussion of next steps is framed conceptually and only occurs after the review is complete. No product recommendations, performance validation, or implementation decisions are assumed.
What Happens After a Review

Some organizations simply want confirmation that their current approach is sound. Others use the review as a decision point.

If further action is desired, Arctis can support a separate, clearly scoped advisory engagement to help evaluate options, coordinate with existing advisors, or support an implementation process.

Any such work is optional, independent, and outside the scope of the Plan Integrity Review.
How Decisions are Evaluated
When considering whether to maintain, modify, or exit an existing arrangement, Arctis evaluates options through a consistent decision framework:

Does the structure still meet the original intent?

Are the economics and risks clearly understood today?

Is the outcome defensible to a board, auditor, or examiner?

Are there simpler or lower-risk alternatives available?

This framework helps organizations move forward deliberately, without urgency or pressure.

Request a Plan Integrity Review

If an independent review would be helpful, we invite you to start a conversation.

Request a Review